Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Shane M. Graber results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 547 hits . Analysis detected 3,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,307 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,360 authors). This Shane M. Graber is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Shane M. Graber
Author details
Total words: 8,307
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst