Topic summary
0% 35 analyzed articles/videos 1,615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nba Finals results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 11,894 hits . Analysis detected 84,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 104,182 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,200 of 15,447 topics). This Nba Finals is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Nba Finals
Topic details
Total words: 104,182
Article count: 35
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score35 analyzed articles104.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst