Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophie Gable results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 1,513 hits . Analysis detected 11,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,317 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,230 of 6,137 authors). This Sophie Gable is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Sophie Gable
Author details
Total words: 12,317
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.6% 10.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst