Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Wright results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,096 hits . Analysis detected 7,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,336 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,663 of 6,628 authors). This Anna Wright is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Anna Wright
Author details
Total words: 10,336
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst