Author summary
46%5 analyzed articles/videos1,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Raskin results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,245 hits. Analysis detected 11,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,156 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,484 of 6,171 authors). This Alex Raskin is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Alex Raskin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Alex Raskin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,156
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510027.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate