Judge in Tiger Woods' DUI case issues major ruling on golf legend's hospital records from his rollover crash 39%

By Alex Raskin47%

7/2/2026, 9:19:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 602 faulty-reasoning hits from 438 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (13,546 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the article peer group.

Tiger Woods' hospital records are in play for Florida prosecutors, a judge has ruled in his DUI case. 
Martin County circuit court judge Darren Steele has approved an agreement between the State Attorney's Office and Woods' legal team that will allow prosecutors to request records from the hospital that treated the PGA legend following his March 27 crash. 
Back in May, Steele approved a similar agreement granting prosecutors access to Woods' prescription medication records from his Palm Beach pharmacy between January 1 and his March crash. 
Prosecutors and Woods' attorney Doug Duncan have agreed to a protective order that limits the release of any hospital or prescription records to the State Attorney's Office, law enforcement, state experts and the defense. 
He is due back in court on August 4. 
Woods, 50, was detained on March 27 after flipping his SUV while trying to overtake a truck and trailer at high speed in the billionaire enclave of Jupiter Island. 
After police found two opioid painkillers in his pocket at the scene, the golf legend was charged with driving under the influence, property damage and refusal to submit to a lawful test. 
Woods sought professional help in Zurich, Switzerland following the crash, briefly returning to Florida after girlfriend Vanessa Trump revealed her breast cancer diagnosis before ultimately finishing treatment. 
Last week, he made a surprise appearance at a PGA press conference in Connecticut, where he introduced CEO Brian Rolapp. 
Otherwise, Woods has been mostly silent since his arrest. 
Woods was closing in on a return to golf and was widely expected to compete at The Masters in the days before the crash. 
He hasn't competed since the 2024 Open Championship at Royal Troon in Scotland and has since undergone surgery to repair a torn Achilles as well as a seventh back procedure. 
The latest saga is the fourth time he has been in trouble after being behind the wheel of a car. 
He was arrested for another DUI in 2017 after police found him slumped in his car in Florida with five drugs in his system, including two painkillers. 
Woods was later involved in a similar crash in 2021 in California, which shattered his right leg after he was trapped under the vehicle. 
He needed multiple surgeries in order to recover from his injuries and has struggled with the troubling heel issue plantar fasciitis ever since. 
He also crashed into a fire hydrant in November 2009 as he tried to flee his Florida home after his then-wife Elin Nordegren discovered his infidelities. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 3.1%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Alex Raskin: 5.3%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic14.8%This article: 5.5%Alex Raskin: 1.5%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.5%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Alex Raskin: 4.7%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.8%Alex Raskin: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Alex Raskin: 2.2%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 34.7%Alex Raskin: 8.1%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias34.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.4%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 2.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 8.8%Daily Mail: 4.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.0%Alex Raskin: 1.7%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 3.5%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.6%Alex Raskin: 4.0%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization4.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 7.1%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 36.3%Alex Raskin: 3.0%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)36.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.4%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.7%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.1%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.2%Alex Raskin: 6.1%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice13.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Raskin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

438 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers23%attributed speech336writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDarren Steele • 40 words • 0.0% coverageDarren Steele • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Duncan • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Doug Duncan

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words33% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.3 ptsWriter: 17.3%Doug Duncan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.