Keyword summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 7,826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiger Woods results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 6,850 hits . Analysis detected 39,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,960 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,107 of 36,903 keywords). This Tiger Woods is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Tiger Woods
Keyword details
Total words: 29,960
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles30K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.4% 19.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst