OutKick89%

Stephen A Smith elects not to dunk on Trump following Knicks NBA Finals victory 29%

By Dan Zaksheske0%

6/14/2026, 11:47:52 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 902 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,542 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the article peer group.

Stephen A. 
Smith had a chance to dunk on President Donald Trump after the New York Knicks won the NBA championship late Saturday night. 
He passed. 
Yes, really. 
After the Knicks beat the San Antonio Spurs, 94-90, in Game 5 of the NBA Finals at Frost Bank Center, OutKick/Fox News Digital caught up with Smith and asked whether he had any response to Trump now that New York had officially ended its 53-year NBA championship drought. 
Smith, who had spent several days talking about Trump’s appearance at Madison Square Garden earlier in the series, wanted no part of it. 
"The Knicks just won the title. 
I don't give a s--- about politics or anything like that. 
I could care less. 
You could ask me tomorrow, you could ask me Tuesday. 
But right now, the New York Knicks just ended a 53-year drought. 
I've waited all my life for this moment. 
And I'm not going to let anything get in the way of that," Smith told OutKick/Fox News Digital. 
"There's no disrespect to you or anybody else. 
It's just that that stuff is the furthest thing from my mind. 
I've been a lifelong New York Knick fan, born in the Bronx raised in Hollis, Queens. 
[There's been] one disappointment after another after another. 
It's been 53 years. 
And it's over," Smith concluded. 
TRUMP TORCHES STEPHEN A SMITH'S PRESIDENTIAL HOPES AFTER KNICKS LOSE GAME 3 WITH TRUMP AT MSG 
That was Stephen A. 
Smith, one of the loudest and most opinionated voices in sports media, choosing not to extend his public back-and-forth with Trump because the Knicks finally won the NBA Finals. 
Imagine that. 
And, to be fair, it was probably the right call. 
Smith had every opportunity to take a victory lap after New York closed out San Antonio. 
The Knicks lost Game 3 with Trump in attendance at Madison Square Garden, which gave Smith plenty of ammunition after he spent the lead-up to the game saying he did not want the president there. 
Smith said Trump had "no business" showing up in New York City for Game 3. 
He argued the president’s presence would create unnecessary chaos around one of the biggest Knicks games in decades. 
He also said he would blame Trump if the Knicks lost. 
Well, the Knicks lost. 
And Trump had a response. 
After attending Game 3 at Madison Square Garden, Trump spoke with reporters before boarding Air Force One to head back to Washington, D.C. 
OutKick/Fox News Digital asked Trump about Smith, who has repeatedly talked about running for president, saying Trump would be responsible if the Knicks lost. 
"I think he’s a nice guy, but you need a certain aptitude to run for president," Trump said at the time. 
"You need a high IQ. 
I’m not sure that Stephen has that. 
I don’t think he does, actually." 
So, there was Trump, after watching the Knicks lose at Madison Square Garden, responding to Smith’s criticism by taking a shot at his constant White House flirtations. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
Smith, of course, responded in kind. 
The "First Take" host went on ESPN the next day with an American flag behind him and presidential music playing in the background and delivered a lengthy monologue. 
"You wanna talk about IQ, I could say I could put my IQ against yours any day of the week," Smith said. 
"I could go one better. 
I can ask you why you’ve been running from me for the last year since I wanted to talk to you. 
I could ask you to debate me since you think you’re that dude. 
We can go a myriad of ways with all of this." 
Trump later escalated the feud Wednesday morning on Truth Social, calling Smith an "arrogant fool," a "low IQ individual" and "dumb as a rock." 
Smith kept firing back, too. 
He continued talking about Trump’s appearance affecting the Knicks, New York City and the overall atmosphere around the Finals. 
In other words, this had all the ingredients of a sports-politics-media feud that could have gone on forever. 
And it still might. 
But, for one night, the Knicks' historic victory took precedence over a war of words. 
Jalen Brunson put on a historic show, scoring a Knicks Finals-record 45 points and willing the franchise to its first NBA title since 1973. 
For a fan base that had spent more than five decades waiting for another championship, that was the story that had Smith's attention. 
Not Trump. 
Not his own potential political future. 
Smith has built an entire career out of always having something to say. 
He debates. 
He rants. 
He monologues. 
He finds a way to make himself part of the story. 
OUTKICK IS NOW ON THE FOX APP: CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD 
But standing inside Frost Bank Center after the Knicks won the NBA Finals, Smith changed his approach. 
No dunking on Trump. 
No victory lap. 
No pivot back to presidential politics. 
Just a Knicks fan trying to process the fact that one disappointment after another after another had finally ended. 
Smith can respond to Trump tomorrow. 
Or Tuesday. 
Or whenever ESPN decides the feud is worthy of another television segment. 
For one night, though, even Stephen A. 
Smith decided the Knicks winning the championship was enough. 
Imagine that. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.1%Dan Zaksheske: 6.1%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Dan Zaksheske: 2.0%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic5.4%This article: 6.9%Dan Zaksheske: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.9%This article: 1.2%Dan Zaksheske: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias1.2%This article: 1.4%Dan Zaksheske: 2.2%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 29.5%Dan Zaksheske: 8.6%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect29.5%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%Dan Zaksheske: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%Dan Zaksheske: 0.6%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Dan Zaksheske: 7.8%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias6.8%This article: 3.5%Dan Zaksheske: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias3.5%This article: 9.4%Dan Zaksheske: 3.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error9.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 3.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 3.6%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Dan Zaksheske: 3.4%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Dan Zaksheske: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 1.2%Dan Zaksheske: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Dan Zaksheske: 5.7%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem5.8%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 2.7%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.8%Dan Zaksheske: 3.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority4.8%This article: 2.0%Dan Zaksheske: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma2.0%This article: 2.7%Dan Zaksheske: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope2.7%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.4%Dan Zaksheske: 7.7%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization1.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.7%Dan Zaksheske: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.7%This article: 4.9%Dan Zaksheske: 4.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion4.9%This article: 2.3%Dan Zaksheske: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 10.4%Dan Zaksheske: 2.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.4%This article: 3.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque3.0%This article: 6.8%Dan Zaksheske: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof6.8%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.7%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division2.7%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.7%Dan Zaksheske: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.7%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Dan Zaksheske: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground1.7%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.3%Dan Zaksheske: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote5.3%This article: 0.7%Dan Zaksheske: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.7%This article: 13.5%Dan Zaksheske: 18.2%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 0.2%Dan Zaksheske: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.2%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 5.1%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Dan Zaksheske: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.7%

902 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers33%attributed speech601writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 6 words • 100.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 11 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 4 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 10 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 12 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 8 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 18 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 8 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 12 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 16 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 8 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 4 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 15 words • 100.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 18 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageOutKick/Fox News Digital • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 22 words • 100.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 5 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 21 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 13 words • 0.0% coverageStephen A. Smith • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words8.0% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.3 ptsWriter: 20.3%OutKick/Fox News Digital: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%OutKick/Fox News Digital: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.3 ptsWriter: 0.3%OutKick/Fox News Digital: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.