Keyword summary
0% 16 analyzed articles/videos 1,536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Antonio Spurs results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 5,183 hits . Analysis detected 37,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,676 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (29,796 of 34,644 keywords). This San Antonio Spurs is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. San Antonio Spurs
Keyword details
Total words: 42,676
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score16 analyzed articles42.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst