Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Graeme Massie results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Indoctrination , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 305 hits . Analysis detected 2,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,244 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Graeme Massie is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Graeme Massie
Author details
Total words: 3,244
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst