Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen A. Smith results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 904 hits . Analysis detected 4,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,577 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,288 of 37,536 keywords). This Stephen A. Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group. Stephen A. Smith
Keyword details
Total words: 2,577
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.9% percentile 4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 35.1% 35.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 35.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Red Herring: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst