OutKick97%

WrestleMania Crowd Crushes Stephen A. Smith With Massive Boos 18%

By Matt Reigle91%

4/19/2026, 12:00:17 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 701 faulty-reasoning hits from 345 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of 18% (16,952 of 20,515 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the article peer group.

WrestleMania 42 is this weekend in Las Vegas  the second year in a row the two-night event has taken place in Sin City  and fans are packing into Allegiant Stadium. 
Fans of professional wrestling. 
Not of Stephen A. 
Smith. 
That was abundantly clear pretty quickly. 
READ: WRESTLEMANIA IS BETTER WITH PAT MCAFEE'S NEW STORYLINE 
The first match, Night 1, was a three-man tag match between Jimmy Uso, Jey Uso, and LA Knight against Logan Paul, Austin Theory, and live streamer IShowSpeed. 
That sounds weird, but it was honestly a way better match than it had any business, capped off with IShowSpeed hitting Logan Paul with the same move through the announce table that he dished out to Jelly Roll at Summer Slam. 
The crowd was buzzing, and before they moved on to the next match between Drew McIntyre and Jacob Fatu, they showed some celebrities in the crowd, like San Francisco 49ers tight end Greg Kittle and Indiana Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton. 
Both are big WWE fans and got huge ovations, especially when Kittle chugged not just his, but also Haliburton's beer. 
But then they got to Stephen A. and, well, there was a considerable mood change… 
Credit to Stephen A. for embracing the heel role. 
I don't think he has too much of a problem with that, though. 
Just ask any Cowboys fan. 
Of course, Stephen A. was likely in the house because this year's WrestleMania is the first one being streamed by ESPN. 
In a pretty interesting move, the first hours of each night are being broadcast for free on ESPN (well, not free. 
You need cable to see it, but you know what I mean). 
The hope seems to be that giving a free taste will get people to run to their phone, tablet, or connected device and sign up for ESPN's streaming platform to watch the best. 
I'm not sure how well that will work out, but hey, it's a tactic that has worked wonders for drug dealers for decades. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%Matt Reigle: 6.4%Outkick: 8.8%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.9%Outkick: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.0%Matt Reigle: 5.9%Outkick: 5.3%Availability Heuristic20.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.3%Outkick: 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.7%Matt Reigle: 1.4%Outkick: 1.9%Hindsight Bias1.7%This article: 10.4%Matt Reigle: 5.8%Outkick: 6.1%Overconfidence Bias10.4%This article: 13.0%Matt Reigle: 10.8%Outkick: 12.5%Framing Effect13.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 9.6%Matt Reigle: 2.0%Outkick: 1.3%Status Quo Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Matt Reigle: 5.4%Outkick: 4.4%Optimism Bias9.6%This article: 6.1%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Outkick: 2.5%Pessimism Bias6.1%This article: 18.8%Matt Reigle: 9.2%Outkick: 12.8%Negativity Bias18.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 4.3%Outkick: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Matt Reigle: 2.0%Outkick: 3.2%Fundamental Attribution Error3.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Outkick: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Matt Reigle: 8.4%Outkick: 5.1%In-Group Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Outkick: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Matt Reigle: 6.9%Outkick: 5.2%Halo Effect8.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.3%Outkick: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 4.2%Outkick: 3.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.6%Outkick: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Matt Reigle: 2.2%Outkick: 4.0%Ad Hominem1.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.7%Outkick: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.6%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Outkick: 3.6%Appeal to Authority2.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Outkick: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 6.7%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Outkick: 1.1%Slippery Slope6.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.0%Matt Reigle: 11.1%Outkick: 11.5%Hasty Generalization18.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.1%Outkick: 1.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.2%Matt Reigle: 1.9%Outkick: 2.4%Bandwagon1.2%This article: 7.0%Matt Reigle: 10.3%Outkick: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion7.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Outkick: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.4%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Outkick: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.3%Outkick: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.2%Outkick: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 24.3%Matt Reigle: 6.8%Outkick: 4.3%Anecdotal24.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Outkick: 0.4%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.5%Matt Reigle: 1.5%Outkick: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.5%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Outkick: 0.7%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 1.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.2%Outkick: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Outkick: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.1%Matt Reigle: 19.7%Outkick: 18.0%Biased Writer Voice6.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.5%Outkick: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 2.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Matt Reigle: 2.9%Outkick: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.2%

345 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.