Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wwe results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 4,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,592 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,458 of 16,344 topics). This Wwe is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Wwe
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,592
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos