Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Edward Lewis results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 1,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Edward Lewis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Edward Lewis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Edward Lewis (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,432
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 9.2%9.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 15.5%15.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Author 9.2%, sitewide 0.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos