Author summary
91% 23 analyzed articles/videos 9,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Reigle results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 6,936 hits . Analysis detected 55,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,211 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,433 of 6,137 authors). This Matt Reigle is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Matt Reigle
Author details
Total words: 35,211
Article count: 23
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score23 analyzed articles35.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.7% 19.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.1% 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst