OutKick89%

Donald Trump shouts out Jaxson Dart after Giants QB's appearance at event was met with controversy 81%

By Matt Reigle91%

5/30/2026, 9:00:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 78.8% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 1,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 316 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 73.3% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,872 of 20,180 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the article peer group.

New York Giants quarterback Jaxson Dart hopping on stage to introduce President Donald Trump, and his teammate Abdul Carter calling him out for it, has been the talk of the sports world this week. 
Everyone has given their take on it, and the two players at the center of it all have worked things out, and it doesn't seem like there's some schism in the team's locker room. 
However, President Trump is firmly on Jaxson Dart's side, as you might expect. 
In fact, he's all in on Jaxson Dart, the WINNER. 
"Thank you Jaxson! 
It was great being with you," the president wrote on his Truth Social platform. 
"I know you’re taking some heat from the Radical Left Lunatics who are jealous of you, me, and everyone who surrounds us but, I also know that your Jersey also went to Number One, and you’re making Millions of Dollars so, YOU ARE A WINNER  THEY ARE ALL LOSERS." 
I can never get enough of the president's writing. 
There's just never been anything like it. 
Can we just take a moment to appreciate the wild capitalization? 
"Radical Left Lunatics" and "Number One" I kind of get because he's almost using them like titles, while "Jersey" reeks of auto-correct. 
But it would've never occurred to me to capitalize "Millions of Dollars," but that's probably because I've never encountered that in my own life. 
Maybe your perspective on it changes when you rake in a cool million... 
I mean Million. 
But man, what a post. 
Just when you think this whole "controversy" is cooling off, here comes the president to take a leaf blower ot the smoldering coals. 
So, now, we'll see if there's any more that comes of this now that President Trump has put the ball back in the Losers' court. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.6%Matt Reigle: 6.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias25.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Matt Reigle: 5.9%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic13.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 5.8%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Matt Reigle: 10.8%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.8%Matt Reigle: 2.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias10.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Matt Reigle: 5.4%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.6%Matt Reigle: 9.2%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias26.6%This article: 27.5%Matt Reigle: 4.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias27.5%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 7.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias7.0%This article: 15.8%Matt Reigle: 8.4%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias15.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 19.0%Matt Reigle: 6.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect19.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 19.6%Matt Reigle: 4.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias19.6%This article: 4.1%Matt Reigle: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%Matt Reigle: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem15.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.7%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.4%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority4.4%This article: 23.7%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma23.7%This article: 7.3%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope7.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 39.6%Matt Reigle: 11.1%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization39.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.5%Matt Reigle: 10.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion3.5%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.2%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.9%Matt Reigle: 6.8%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal14.9%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.9%Matt Reigle: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.9%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 7.6%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity7.6%This article: 3.2%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading3.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.9%Matt Reigle: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.9%This article: 0.9%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.9%This article: 78.8%Matt Reigle: 19.7%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice78.8%This article: 15.8%Matt Reigle: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination15.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

316 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker21%attributed speech249writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 3 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
67 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+74.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 74.6%74.6%Politically Right Leaning -10.0 ptsWriter: 10.0%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+4.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 4.5%4.5%Quote-first Misdirection+4.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 4.5%4.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.