Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Giants results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 875 hits. Analysis detected 6,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,118 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,940 of 16,562 topics). This New York Giants is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
New York Giants
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,118
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
5.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.1%28.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.8%18.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.6%24.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos