Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 480 hits. Analysis detected 2,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,656 of 15,325 topics). This Presidential is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Presidential
Topic details
Total words: 1,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 38.0%38.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 9.9%9.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos