OutKick87%

Dana White says he refused to get down during White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting 66%

By Matt Reigle91%

4/26/2026, 3:55:14 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 365 faulty-reasoning hits from 386 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (6,918 of 20,370 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the article peer group.

The reactions to the shocking shooting at the White House Correspondents' Dinner are coming in, but I don't think you'll see too many like the one coming from UFC boss Dana White. 
White is, of course, a close friend of the president and was invited to the event. 
In fact, he was even interviewed on the red carpet and talked about the upcoming UFC Freedom 250 that will take place at the White House on June 14. 
But the night took a turn when a gunman stormed a security checkpoint and shot a Secret Service agent, who is, thankfully, expected to be okay. 
UFC'S BRUCE BUFFER SAYS IT WILL BE AN 'HONOR' TO BE AT WHITE HOUSE: 'IT'S GONNA BE AMAZING' 
Fortunately, there have been no reports of attendees being hurt, and President Trump, the first lady, Vice President JD Vance, and other Trump administration officials were taken out of the room while guests hid under tables. 
Obviously, the ballroom where the dinner was taking place was filled with more than 2,000 people who were understandably very shaken by what had happened. 
However, Dana White was not one of those rattled by it. 
As guests were filing out of the Washington Hilton ballroom and the surrounding area, White took a second to talk to some reporters on his way out about what he experienced. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
"It started getting noisy, tables started flipping over, guys running in with guns, and they were screaming 'Get down,'" White said. 
"I didn't get down. 
It was f--king awesome. 
I literally took every minute of it in, and it was a pretty crazy, unique experience." 
White said he was sitting right in front of the head table, where the president, vice president and first lady, press secretary Karoline Leavitt, White House Correspondents’ Association members and others were seated. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
"Guys came in looking for shooters," he continued. 
"They came toward our table. 
I thought the shooter was over by us or something." 
I don't think too many people would react to a situation of this magnitude the way Dana White did, but he's certainly built differently. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 6.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Matt Reigle: 5.9%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic2.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Matt Reigle: 5.8%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 10.8%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 21.2%Matt Reigle: 5.4%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias21.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 9.2%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 4.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Matt Reigle: 8.4%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 17.4%Matt Reigle: 6.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect17.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 4.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.7%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 11.1%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.7%Matt Reigle: 10.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion5.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.2%Matt Reigle: 6.8%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal6.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.3%Matt Reigle: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote8.3%This article: 4.7%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection4.7%This article: 17.4%Matt Reigle: 19.7%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice17.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Matt Reigle: 2.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.0%

386 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers31%attributed speech267writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageBruce Buffer • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageDana White • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageDana White • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bruce Buffer

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words15% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bruce Buffer: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+94.8 ptsWriter: 5.2%Bruce Buffer: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-25.1 ptsWriter: 25.1%Bruce Buffer: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.6 ptsWriter: 8.6%Bruce Buffer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.