Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video345 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Professional Wrestling results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 1,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,539 of 15,852 topics). This Professional Wrestling is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Professional Wrestling
Topic details
Total words: 1,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos