Topic summary
40% 47 analyzed articles/videos 11,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Knicks results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 12,323 hits . Analysis detected 103,441 faulty-reasoning hits from 123,137 analyzed words across 47 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (13,922 of 15,389 topics). This New York Knicks is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. New York Knicks
Topic details
Total words: 123,137
Article count: 47
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score47 analyzed articles123.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.0% 10.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst