Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Kyle Wagner results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 2,492 hits . Analysis detected 10,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,372 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Kyle Wagner is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kyle Wagner
Author details
Total words: 9,372
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.6% 26.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst