Topic summary
49% 9 analyzed articles/videos 2,715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Music Industry results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 3,777 hits . Analysis detected 26,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,972 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,652 of 16,559 topics). This Music Industry is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Music Industry
Topic details
Total words: 29,972
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles30K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst