The Verge56%

Here are the 30,000 songs Sony is suing Udio’s AI music generator over 62%

By Emma Roth43%

7/20/2026, 10:19:12 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 560 faulty-reasoning hits from 276 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.2% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,196 of 21,204 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the article peer group.

Sony Music Entertainment has filed another lawsuit against Udio, accusing the AI music generator of infringing the copyright of more than 30,000 of its songs, ranging from Elvis Presley’s Hound Dog to Beyoncé’s Say My Name, and Harry Styles’ As It Was. 
The lawsuit, filed in a New York court on Monday, claims that this list represents “only a small portion of Plaintiffs’ works that Udio infringed,” as reported earlier by Music Business Worldwide. 
In 2024, Sony, along with Universal Music Group and Warner Records, filed a lawsuit against Udio and the AI music-maker Suno. 
After gaining access to Udio’s training data through discovery, Sony claims it identified additional songs using an “audio fingerprinting” technique. 
Sony filed a request to add more than 30,000 songs that Udio allegedly “copied and ingested into its generative AI models,” but a judge later rejected the company’s motion, leaving the scope of the original lawsuit at 333 works. 
Sony has now made the more than 30,000 songs the subject of its new lawsuit, which the company says it could expand. 
It claims Udio “admitted that its generative AI models were ‘constructed by showing the program a vast amount of different kinds of sound recordings,’” including from YouTube. 
UMG and Warner Music Group have since settled with Udio and are now partnering with the company as the music industry embraces AI. 
You can read the full list of songs Sony is suing Udio over in this filing. 
The company is asking to block Udio from infringing its works, as well as for up to $150,000 per work infringed. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 21.4%Emma Roth: 4.7%The Verge: 3.6%Confirmation Bias21.4%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 2.2%The Verge: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 4.0%The Verge: 3.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.3%The Verge: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 1.5%The Verge: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Emma Roth: 11.4%The Verge: 6.1%Framing Effect4.7%This article: 7.6%Emma Roth: 1.4%The Verge: 0.9%Loss Aversion7.6%This article: 14.1%Emma Roth: 1.4%The Verge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias14.1%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.4%The Verge: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%Emma Roth: 7.3%The Verge: 4.0%Optimism Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.9%The Verge: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Emma Roth: 8.0%The Verge: 9.4%Negativity Bias15.2%This article: 7.2%Emma Roth: 3.8%The Verge: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 1.0%The Verge: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.4%The Verge: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.6%The Verge: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 3.0%The Verge: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 2.6%The Verge: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 1.2%The Verge: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.6%The Verge: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.8%Emma Roth: 8.4%The Verge: 4.0%Appeal to Authority18.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.6%The Verge: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.4%The Verge: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.3%The Verge: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 3.4%The Verge: 6.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.9%The Verge: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 8.3%Emma Roth: 0.3%The Verge: 0.7%Bandwagon8.3%This article: 8.3%Emma Roth: 1.4%The Verge: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion8.3%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.5%The Verge: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 4.5%The Verge: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.6%Emma Roth: 3.3%The Verge: 0.8%Burden of Proof7.6%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.3%The Verge: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 2.0%The Verge: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.8%Emma Roth: 4.3%The Verge: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.8%The Verge: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 21.4%Emma Roth: 5.6%The Verge: 2.5%Unattributed Quote21.4%This article: 9.8%Emma Roth: 2.2%The Verge: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection9.8%This article: 34.8%Emma Roth: 9.3%The Verge: 10.7%Biased Writer Voice34.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.3%The Verge: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Roth: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Emma Roth: 4.4%The Verge: 4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.8%

276 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers39%attributed speech169writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageSony Music Entertainment • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSony • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageSony • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageUMG • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
42 attributed words39% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+79.9 ptsWriter: 20.1%Sony Music Entertainment: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-34.9 ptsWriter: 34.9%Sony Music Entertainment: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-16.0 ptsWriter: 16.0%Sony Music Entertainment: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.5 ptsWriter: 9.5%Sony Music Entertainment: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.