Author summary
43% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Roth results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 826 hits . Analysis detected 7,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,252 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,949 of 6,347 authors). This Emma Roth is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Emma Roth
Author details
Total words: 7,252
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.3% 9.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst