Author summary
30%11 analyzed articles/videos3,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jay Peters results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,633 hits. Analysis detected 13,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,559 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,047 of 6,244 authors). This Jay Peters is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Jay Peters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
20%Jay Peters (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,559
Article count: 11
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510019.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate