20 ways Taylor Swift remade pop culture in her image 56%

By Laura Snapes0% Owen Myers0% Shaad D'Souza0%

6/12/2026, 6:00:38 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.6% saturation with 1,357 hits. Analysis detected 8,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,262 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.7% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,126 of 20,517 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the article peer group.

Released 20 years ago, Taylor Swift’s debut single is, on the surface, a tribute to the power of music, and about how hearing a song by your favourite artist can send you back to the memories associated with first hearing it. 
She named Tim McGraw after one of her favourite country singers, with a sentiment aimed at a former boyfriend who had left her behind: “When you think Tim McGraw,” she sang, “I hope you think of me.” 
The power of Swift’s songwriting and the immediate force of her presence as a pop star mean that that is what most of us think when we think Tim McGraw. 
From day one, we could see Swift’s power to remake culture in her own image, a talent that has  two decades on  made her one of history’s biggest pop stars. 
The sleek 36-year-old showgirl we know today may seem a million miles from that country teen with her corkscrew curls and cowboy boots. 
But if you look past the slightly hokey southern twang on her debut single, that song contains almost everything we know about Swift as an artist today. 
The fundamentals are there: no 21st-century pop star has written about romance better, and she conjures her setting with what would become her trademark intimate detail  the “little black dress” that would make way for that scarf she left at an ex’s sister’s house; the moon on the lake that foreshadowed all the kissing in the rain; the cars parked down back roads where the young couple had secret trysts lit the way for hitting the brakes too soon. 
But we can also see her assured sense of rewriting tired narratives. 
From the first line, when she recalls her lover telling her “the way my blue eyes shined put those Georgia stars to shame”, she tells him: “That’s a lie.” 
Swift knows she tells better stories than everyone else. 
From day one, she also knew the power of being the person who gets to tell the story. 
Here she rewrote small-town southern romance; years later she undid the man-eater archetype on Blank Space and gave life to the spectre of the “mad” woman on The Last Great American Dynasty. 
In Tim McGraw, once the guy has left, she writes him a letter that tells him how he should think about their time together, and leaves it on his doorstep  the bold author of her own fate. 
He may have gone, but in extremely Swiftian form, it’s her who is having the last word: the foes who would later inspire songs such as Mean, Bad Blood and Look What You Made Me Do never stood a chance. 
She also knows how to make time work for her, backflipping around the chronology of their relationship  from past memories to present pain to future nostalgia  to take complete narrative control of a situation. 
You might hear a song from your past and get a vague warm, fuzzy feeling. 
Swift is a beautiful freak who remembers it from every angle, all too well. 
From the beginning, Swift showed us exactly who she was, revealing the innate focus that helped create the defining pop songs of our time  as well as a career that wrote her into legend, making her the lens through which we understand so much of pop, pop culture, womanhood, the music industry, and much, much more. 
Here are the 20 ways she remade the world in her own image. 
Laura Snapes 
Image credits: Jeff Kravitz/FilmMagic; Big Machine Records 
She escaped growing pains 
Growing pains have always been a rite of passage for teen-girl pop stars  as much as the No 1 singles and big-budget videos. 
In a more manufactured era, obsolescence was built in: inevitably you would rebel against the system that controlled you, and, inevitably, it would spit you out. 
Swift understood that maintaining control would protect her. 
She knew that writing her own songs would create an authentic personal relationship with fans  one that she assiduously deepened IRL  that no label would dare mess with. 
From 2008, when she released her second album, Fearless, her management became a family business. 
Being the flagship success of a small label, Big Machine, also gave her the agency to grow on her own terms; label head Scott Borchetta even encouraged it, suggesting that 2010’s biting Speak Now shouldn’t be named Enchanted, after a lovestruck song of the same name, because she was no longer writing about “fairytales and high school”. 
Every corkscrew curl, princess dress and bowler hat was her own choice; she marked her growth in her genre evolution, from country to emo to sleek pop. 
As she said in 2015: “As far as the need to rebel against the idea of you, or the image of you: like, I feel no need to burn down the house I built by hand. 
I can make additions to it. 
I can redecorate. 
But I built this.” 
You could argue it came at a cost. 
Interviews with the teenage Swift reveal someone acutely aware of the price of stepping out of line: in high school, she characterised her refusal to party as a choice “between being popular or not messing my life up”; she didn’t drink until she turned 21 (“I knew I couldn’t get away with it until then”) and knew that after you mess up once, “people are going to be waiting for you to mess up again”. 
In 2009, one profile writer noted: “Self-preservation is one of Swift’s favourite phrases.” 
Several of the older, unreleased songs she resurfaced as the bonus “From the Vault” tracks on her Taylor’s Version re-recordings dwelled on her anxiety about being replaced by younger models. 
That level of control and perfection is just as unsustainable as, say, pretences over Britney’s virginity; you could see how it may have contributed to the disordered eating Swift experienced in the mid-2010s, and how unbearable it would have been when she lost control of the narrative for a few years around then. 
Yet, Swift made it to young adulthood without directly creating scandal or revolt. 
You suspect her unmatched polish may have sent the press, as her ingenue status faded, searching for any stick to beat her with and coming up with  her very normal boyfriend count. 
The pathetic nature of those charges underscored a rigged game no amount of perfection could beat  but Swift got further than most, and opened up a slipstream for her successors to self-define. 
LS 
Image credits: Ethan Miller/Getty Images 
She made the traditional vanguard 
If you want to understand Swift, just think about Apple  yes, the computer company. 
Apple, famously, has rarely invented anything. 
Its reputation for quality, intuitive products has almost made it anti-innovation; when gizmos such as touchscreen smartphones or tablets were first introduced to the market, Apple didn’t rush to release its own competitor. 
Instead, it waited until said products were familiar, and then released best-in-class versions. 
Swift works in a similar fashion. 
She tends to change slowly. 
When it comes to producers, she started out working with Nashville stalwart Nathan Chapman before making a few songs on her 2012 album, Red, with Max Martin and Shellback, two of the era’s super-producers: together they incorporated tinny synths and light dubstep drops, the sound du jour of a few years earlier. 
On 2014’s 1989, she worked mostly with Martin and Shellback, but made a few songs with Jack Antonoff, a then-unknown who had notched a megahit, We Are Young, with his band Fun a few years earlier. 
In 2017, Reputation was another Antonoff/Martin and Shellback split, but on songs such as Ready for It and I Did Something Bad, she essentially presented a more mainstream-friendly version of the harsh electro sound that her then-nemesis Kanye West, now Ye, had worked with on his culture-shifting 2013 record Yeezus. 
Versions of this story recur throughout Swift’s career. 
With each record, she almost always inches her sound forward, but she’s rarely, if ever, the first to work with a new face or a new style. 
This is, in many ways, an inversion of how pop stars as big as Swift used to work. 
Madonna and Michael Jackson  two of the only musicians who have ever achieved the same level of cultural saturation and interest  tended to look to the underground for inspiration, in terms of music, fashion and aesthetics, and make those underground styles commercially viable. 
(Think Madonna turning the ballroom culture that her backing dancers came from into Vogue, one of her most indelible hits.) 
Swift’s strategy is deeply reflective of her time: one in which it pays to be risk-averse and give the people exactly what they want, when they want it. 
OM 
Image credits: Matt Sayles, Invision/AP 
She reclaimed cringe 
In the run-up to the 2020 US election, an entire news cycle was dedicated to speculating on whether Swift would endorse a presidential candidate. 
She confirmed her support of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the cutesiest way possible: with a tray of homemade cookies. 
Swift is cringe, but she is free: self-directing corny videos, selling references from her own songs  cardigans and red scarves  as merch, hosting fan parties at her house and writing the worst Instagram captions known to mankind. 
(She saved one of the most groan-inducing for her engagement announcement, writing: “Your English teacher and your gym teacher are getting married.”) 
And while it feels incongruous for Swift, a noted fan of a sourdough starter, to make “wine moms” the butt of the joke in songs, perhaps it only adds to her bona fides: there’s nothing cringier than a lack of self-awareness. 
OM 
Image credits: Instagram/taylorswift; Startraks/REX/Shutterstock 
She made competency a flex 
While Swift’s songs are full of wayward emotions, she runs her career with military precision. 
As a kid, when her friends were watching the Disney Channel, she studied episodes of VH1’s Behind the Music and deduced that artists went off the rails when “they lost their level of self-awareness”. 
It made her hawkish about ambition and execution: as a teenager, she outwitted Nashville stalwarts, challenging them on industry norms and understanding exactly how to play the game to get ahead. 
When she was criticised for her singing or dancing, she skilled up. 
When foes came for her, she wised up: “I got smarter, I got harder in the nick of time,” as she sang on Look What You Made Me Do. 
From big-picture concepts to the finest details, Swift is a one-woman panopticon on her own career. 
Of course, all-encompassing professional excellence is also a very Beyoncé trait  but she doesn’t show her hand the same way. 
Swift wrote the 21st-century playbook on elite pop stardom, and she wants us to know it. 
LS 
Image credits: Gareth Cattermole/TAS24/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management 
She bent formats to her will 
Streaming and social media have siloed the watercooler entertainment age. 
What seems like the biggest thing in the world to you  Marvel movies, Joe Rogan  might mean nothing to the person next to you on the bus scrolling K-pop fan cams. 
Swift has transcended mass fragmentation to become the default pop star. 
You could argue that’s because her career predates this new cultural reality, but plenty of old-school pop stars failed to leap that Rubicon. 
Swift’s enduring song craft, strategy and gossip factor kept her star bright. 
She is maturing on her own terms, but remains relevant to new, young fans: the Taylor’s Version re-recordings let Swifties who were too little to remember their original releases feel a sense of participation and ownership. 
The ensuing Eras tour, showcasing (almost) every Swift album, innately reflected the poignancy of how many generations of fans had grown up alongside her work. 
Her music is universally accessible (and, crucially, approved by parents). 
Infants can bop to it. 
It’s a ready-made belief system for young fans discovering themselves. 
It’s so detailed it commands Zapruder-level analysis from hardcore stans; so well-crafted that even old, classic rock dudes respect her. 
I am often stunned at how casual music fans who otherwise don’t participate in fandom culture refer to themselves as Swifties. 
Her presence and influence have made her so powerful that streaming platforms and international governments alike have to kiss the ring. 
It means she can set the terms of engagement. 
To see the music video for last year’s The Fate of Ophelia on its weekend of release, you had to shell out for a cinema ticket, making Swift a Disney-like conglomerate unto herself. 
It is Swift’s world, and we’re very much living in it. 
LS 
Image credits: Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP 
She set new melodic standards 
For years, Swift was known as pop’s card-carrying romantic, a woman who would be so audacious as to re-write Romeo & Juliet with a happy ending, or write an entire song of Kennedy family fanfic (Starlight) while dating a Kennedy and then perform it for the Kennedys. 
As time went on, her relationship with love in her music became more complicated: although she sang of new love on 2017’s Reputation, she also wrote about feeling doomed to single life forever because of impediments she couldn’t control, and on 2020’s Folklore wrote about missed connections with exes who she still thought about. 
By 2022’s Midnights, Swift seemed ambivalent towards the traditional ideas of “settling down” she had once aspired to in song. 
On multiple songs from that record, she expressed uneasiness about the idea of getting married at, potentially, the expense of her own autonomy. 
And she bemoaned the idea that the cultural idea of womanhood was still so narrow: “All they keep askin’ me / Is if I’m gonna be your bride,” she sang on Lavender Haze. 
“The only kind of girl they see / Is a one-night or a wife.” 
This arc  from one-true-love fairytales to wondering if marriage is even in the cards at all  mirrors that of a lot of women I know who are roughly Swift’s age. 
Although Swift has almost certainly never been on a dating app, the bleakness of Midnights  and its follow-up, The Tortured Poets Department, which came after the end of her longest relationship, and on which Swift confesses she’s “down bad crying at the gym”  feels of a piece of the grim way in which many of my single female friends speak about their romantic lives. 
For many years, Swift’s was pop’s ultimate heteropessimist, putting a pin in romantic ideals she had helped create. 
In a sense, the romantic crash outs of Tortured Poets created a new facet of relatability in Swift’s work, which had become increasingly insular over the preceding years  suddenly, she was a romantic newbie just like many of her fans, trying to work out why what felt like true love had curdled so quickly. 
And then she took another step that reminded me of my mid-30s friends. 
In what felt like the blink of an eye, she found a new jock dreamboat in American football player Kelce, to fulfil the romantic fantasies that seemed so out of reach a few years earlier. 
Swift’s romantic path is one fairly specific to millennial womanhood, in that she could have chosen a marriage-less path but ultimately decided not to; in capturing that path in song, she essentially memorialised the millennial dating experience on a mass scale. 
SDS 
She spiced up the charts 
Every new Swift release arrives alongside a swathe of CD, vinyl, cassette and digital variants, all of which help her maintain her career-long chart dominance. 
Many artists do this, of course, but Swift, who drops limited releases through a complex system of timed windows and exclusive retailers  itself a bugbear to many devoted fans  has mastered the art of gaming the charts, often to others’ detriment. 
When it looked like Billie Eilish might unseat Swift’s The Tortured Poets Department in 2024, Swift released three digital variants to hold the top spot; Charli xcx’s Brat nearly did the same in the UK, so Swift released six UK-only album variants within the last few hours of chart eligibility and stayed at No 1. 
Lana Del Rey has said that Swift once told her she “wants success more than anyone”  and it’s clear she knows how to get it. 
SDS 
Image credits: OfficialCharts.com/PA 
She broke the indie/pop binary 
Swift was hardly the first pop star to reinvent herself with each album, but she was arguably the first to turn the idea of discrete “eras” into a marketing tool. 
With her Eras tour, she merchandised a concept previously owned by fans and made it a pillar of her business model. 
Now, she sells the same cardigan in a new colour scheme alongside each new album and reissues old merch with new photos. 
She even revamped the Eras tour halfway through its run to include a new Era (naturally, the Eras tour film was also revamped). 
The concept has since been adopted by countless other artists  turning the dreaded “greatest hits” tour, once a signal an artist was over the hill culturally, into a sign of strength. 
SDS 
Image credits: Matt Sayles/AP; Beth Garrabrant; Xavi Torrent/TAS24/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management 
She set the narrative 
Like many other stars of her ilk, Swift rarely does traditional interviews any more. 
Almost all information about her life and career released into the world comes through Swift’s official channels, and she’s trained fans to understand that her word is gospel. 
When she does make media appearances, it’s calculated: she spoke to Variety, a Hollywood trade magazine, about her ambition to become a director; she announced last year’s The Life of a Showgirl on New Heights, a podcast hosted by her fiance Kelce. 
In each interview, Swift doled out information specifically designed to position herself and her career at that point in time. 
Sometimes, what she shares is contradictory: when Swift released a 10-minute version of her 2012 song All Too Well in 2021, she told fans it originated from a jam session with her band where she basically ad-libbed the song on the spot, even though the song’s co-writer Liz Rose had said there was never officially a 10-minute version; instead, she and Swift had pared the song down from an abundance of ideas Swift brought to her. 
Plus, ATW10 bears the clear marks of Swift’s post-Folklore songwriting style, as well as a mention of a keychain bearing the phrase “Fuck the patriarchy”, hardly common in 2010. 
But it’s tricky to argue the narrative when Swift keeps things so tightly bound. 
Call it Public Relations (Taylor’s Version). 
SDS 
Image credits: Kevin Winter/TAS24/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management 
She resuscitated monoculture 
Few A-list female pop stars have sustained an A-list pop career for as long as Swift has, and far fewer have made it beyond that point. 
(Even Madonna’s imperial period faltered just over 20 years in.) 
So what do the next 20 years look like? 
Swift’s nuptials to Kelce are, as they say, impending. 
Maybe her song for the Toy Story 5 soundtrack suggests a hankering for an Oscar  or tees up her fans’ hankering for her to return to country music. 
She’s not likely to mount an Eras-scale tour again any time soon  but maybe that creates opportunities for looser, more intimate live showcases. 
Our critics look at what they think Swift will do next  and what they want her to. 
Image credits: Roslan Rahman/AFP/Getty Images 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.3%Laura Snapes: 15.2%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias10.3%This article: 0.6%Laura Snapes: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.6%This article: 10.5%Laura Snapes: 2.8%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic10.5%This article: 5.5%Laura Snapes: 1.6%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.5%This article: 4.6%Laura Snapes: 1.4%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias4.6%This article: 6.5%Laura Snapes: 5.7%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias6.5%This article: 2.3%Laura Snapes: 1.6%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.8%Laura Snapes: 0.7%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.8%This article: 1.0%Laura Snapes: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.0%This article: 2.7%Laura Snapes: 0.9%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias2.7%This article: 2.2%Laura Snapes: 0.6%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.2%This article: 13.5%Laura Snapes: 3.4%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias13.5%This article: 0.5%Laura Snapes: 0.1%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.5%This article: 3.6%Laura Snapes: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error3.6%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Laura Snapes: 0.4%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 20.3%Laura Snapes: 12.3%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect20.3%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Laura Snapes: 1.1%the Guardian: 1.1%Recency Bias4.6%This article: 3.2%Laura Snapes: 1.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Laura Snapes: 0.3%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem1.3%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.0%Laura Snapes: 1.4%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority5.0%This article: 5.0%Laura Snapes: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma5.0%This article: 1.5%Laura Snapes: 0.6%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope1.5%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 27.4%Laura Snapes: 15.5%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization27.4%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.3%Laura Snapes: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 7.6%Laura Snapes: 2.2%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 0.9%Laura Snapes: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question0.9%This article: 14.8%Laura Snapes: 4.8%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.8%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.5%Laura Snapes: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof1.5%This article: 0.9%Laura Snapes: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.9%This article: 3.1%Laura Snapes: 0.8%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division3.1%This article: 14.4%Laura Snapes: 4.7%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal14.4%This article: 0.7%Laura Snapes: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.7%This article: 8.3%Laura Snapes: 2.1%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.3%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 2.0%Laura Snapes: 0.5%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity2.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.7%Laura Snapes: 2.1%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote7.7%This article: 3.6%Laura Snapes: 0.9%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.6%This article: 41.6%Laura Snapes: 17.5%the Guardian: 10.5%Biased Writer Voice41.6%This article: 4.0%Laura Snapes: 1.1%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination4.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Snapes: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Laura Snapes: 0.9%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.5%

3262 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers9.1%attributed speech2,966writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 80 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 57 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageScott Borchetta • 57 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 36 words • 100.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 6 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 75 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 33 words • 100.0% coverageTaylor Swift • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 66 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 0.0% coverageLana Del Rey • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 76 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lana Del Rey

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words8.8% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-45.8 ptsWriter: 45.8%Lana Del Rey: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%Lana Del Rey: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Lana Del Rey: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%Lana Del Rey: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.