Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor-Swift results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 4,212 hits . Analysis detected 14,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,768 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,816 of 37,536 keywords). This Taylor-Swift is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Taylor-Swift
Keyword details
Total words: 9,768
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 43.1% 43.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 43.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst