Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor-Swift results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 4,212 hits. Analysis detected 14,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,768 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,816 of 37,536 keywords). This Taylor-Swift is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510060.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 43.1%43.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 43.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

For Taylor Swift, Madison Square Garden’s Controversial Cameras Briefly Went Dark23%
WIRED16%By Noah Shachtman13%7/23/2026, 11:18:46 AM
Why Conservatives Are Losing Their War Against The Odyssey66%
Washington Monthly52%By Paul Glastris0%7/22/2026, 2:00:00 AM
Travis Kelce39%
New York Post89%By Matt Ehalt0%7/11/2026, 5:47:20 AM
Mayor Zohran Mamdani reveals how much Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce paid to NYC to cover cost of resources for MSG wedding53%
Daily Mail Online78%By Justin Enriquez58% Sonia Horon For Dailymail.Com65% Rachel Bowman For Dailymail.Com65%7/10/2026, 4:03:09 PM
Are these real photos from Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's wedding?10%
Snopes7%By Taija PerryCook7%7/9/2026, 3:00:08 AM
Taylor Swift’s Wedding Dress Had a 25-Foot Train74%
Yahoo Entertainment39%By Mehera Bonner0%7/8/2026, 4:34:12 AM
Taylor Swift fans buy up wedding trash gathered outside venue and sold online19%
The Independent45%By Owen Scott0%7/8/2026, 4:05:43 AM
Dior Shares New Details on Taylor Swift’s Wedding Dress Reveal34%
Yahoo Entertainment39%By Alyssa Bailey0%7/7/2026, 9:15:35 AM
Taylor Swift’s wedding dress designer is signaling something new about the bride.67%
Slate Magazine69%By Christina Cauterucci0%7/7/2026, 8:50:21 AM
Inside Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's wedding: What we know39%
CBC News49%By Griffin Jaeger0%7/6/2026, 3:41:38 PM