Author summary
7% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,732 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taija PerryCook results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 740 hits . Analysis detected 8,234 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,179 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,791 of 6,170 authors). This Taija PerryCook is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Taija PerryCook
Author details
Total words: 17,179
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst