Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Griffin Jaeger results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 590 hits . Analysis detected 2,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,033 of 6,348 authors). This Griffin Jaeger is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Griffin Jaeger
Author details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 19.8%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst