Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,335 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Cauterucci results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 3,769 hits . Analysis detected 13,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,920 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,047 of 6,628 authors). This Christina Cauterucci is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Christina Cauterucci
Author details
Total words: 8,920
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.1% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 42.3% 42.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 42.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 11.1%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst