Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fandom results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 2,282 hits. Analysis detected 14,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,447 topics). This Fandom is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fandom
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 13,048
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.5%15.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos