Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 13,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pop And Rock results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 6,509 hits . Analysis detected 57,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 59,569 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (28,335 of 35,549 keywords). This Pop And Rock is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Pop And Rock
Keyword details
Total words: 59,569
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles59.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst