Topic summary
43% 12 analyzed articles/videos 3,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Economy results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 2,479 hits . Analysis detected 20,411 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,350 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,431 of 15,762 topics). This Local Economy is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group. Local Economy
Topic details
Total words: 35,350
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score12 analyzed articles35.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst