Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos4,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Flemming results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 1,885 hits. Analysis detected 18,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,964 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,603 of 6,348 authors). This Jack Flemming is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Jack Flemming
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
12%Jack Flemming (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 24,964
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

12% percentile
025507510011.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles25K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate