The World Cup brought tons of visitors to Kansas City. Why aren’t all businesses benefiting? 33%

By Steve Kraske0% Halle Jackson0%

7/1/2026, 4:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 514 faulty-reasoning hits from 362 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.6% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,695 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the article peer group.

While some Kansas City businesses have reported sales slowed significantly during the tournament, others  like barbecue restaurants and local merch shops  have seen extreme demand from visitors. 
World Cup traffic has been highly dependent on what businesses sell and where they’re located. 
A month ago, Kansas City businesses were waiting with bated breath for the World Cup to begin. 
In the lead-up to the tournament, organizers promised hundreds of thousands of visitors who would all want to eat, drink and shop at local businesses while in town. 
Once the tournament started, though, some owners began to raise alarms when the foot traffic failed to appear  or worse, sales decreased. 
Bisou, a cafe in Kansas City’s Westside neighborhood, was one of the first to post about seeing a big slowdown. 
The post garnered nearly 8,000 likes and hundreds of comments, many by other business owners sharing similar stories. 
The story got lots of attention online and in the media. 
But it’s not the full picture, says Travis Meier, a reporter for Axios Kansas City. 
Meier spoke with nearly 15 Kansas City businesses, and found a huge variety in the amount of traffic they received. 
Barbecue restaurants, for example, are seeing extreme demand surrounding match days  sometimes even more than normal for a Chiefs home game. 
But other shops, like those far away from downtown or the Fan Festival, or those who don’t normally cater to tourists, are much quieter than expected. 
Some say their regulars stopped coming to avoid crowds. 
Meyer said that whether a business is busy during the World Cup depends on a variety of factors, like location, product and reputation. 
“If you're a plant shop, it is very hard to travel… especially internationally with plants, so you're probably not going to get any international visitors,” Meier told KCUR’s Up To Date. 
“But if you are selling Kansas City souvenirs, if you're selling Kansas City clothing… and celebrating the different teams that we've had here, and they've said that they've sold out of pretty much every design.” 
Travis Meier, Axios Kansas City 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.4%Steve Kraske: 3.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias17.4%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Steve Kraske: 3.6%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic10.5%This article: 5.5%Steve Kraske: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.5%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 14.1%Steve Kraske: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias14.1%This article: 1.4%Steve Kraske: 6.0%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Steve Kraske: 8.1%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Steve Kraske: 7.8%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias13.5%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 4.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 3.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 2.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 4.6%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.2%Steve Kraske: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma7.2%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.5%Steve Kraske: 5.5%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization5.5%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.0%Steve Kraske: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon5.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 7.4%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.5%Steve Kraske: 3.7%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 17.7%Steve Kraske: 3.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal17.7%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 24.3%Steve Kraske: 3.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)24.3%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.6%Steve Kraske: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote8.6%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.1%Steve Kraske: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice4.1%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

362 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers36%attributed speech233writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTravis Meier • 15 words • 100.0% coverageTravis Meier • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTravis Meier • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTravis Meier • 31 words • 100.0% coverageTravis Meier • 35 words • 0.0% coverageAxios Kansas City • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Travis Meier

81%flagged-word coverage
124 attributed words96% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote+25.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Travis Meier: 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer Voice+12.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Travis Meier: 12.1%12.1%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.