Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video147.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Travis Meier results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 285.15 faulty-reasoning hits from 147.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,372 of 28,364 speakers). This Travis Meier is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Travis Meier
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 147.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.7% percentile
16.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos147.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.3%19.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos