Author summary
15% 3 analyzed articles/videos 707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Hopkins results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 352 hits . Analysis detected 1,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,688 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,524 of 6,382 authors). This Sarah Hopkins is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group. Sarah Hopkins
Author details
Total words: 4,688
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst