Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mike Sherry results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 1,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,069 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,528 authors). This Mike Sherry is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mike Sherry
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Mike Sherry (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 9,069
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos