Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Issis Banks results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 262 hits. Analysis detected 2,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,756 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (4,833 of 6,244 authors). This Issis Banks is better (less manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
Issis Banks
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠23%Issis Banks (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,756
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510022.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos