Topic summary
28% 10 analyzed articles/videos 15,616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Security results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 4,678 hits . Analysis detected 44,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,000 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (14,816 of 15,447 topics). This International Security is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group. International Security
Topic details
Total words: 61,000
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles61K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CSIS 31% 7/1/2026, 10:00:00 AM