Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matthew Cebul results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,185 hits . Analysis detected 7,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Matthew Cebul is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Matthew Cebul
Author details
Total words: 9,276
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.6% 11.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst