Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Erlanger results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 609 hits . Analysis detected 3,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,057 of 6,629 authors). This Steven Erlanger is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Steven Erlanger
Author details
Total words: 4,628
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst