Author summary
20% 1 analyzed article/video 2,740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Quilliam results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Slippery Slope , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 436 hits . Analysis detected 3,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,576 of 6,628 authors). This Neil Quilliam is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Neil Quilliam
Author details
Total words: 8,220
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst