Topic summary
42% 19 analyzed articles/videos 15,456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Contracts results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 8,043 hits . Analysis detected 59,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,914 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (13,644 of 16,562 topics). This Government Contracts is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Government Contracts
Topic details
Total words: 62,914
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score19 analyzed articles62.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst