Author summary
60% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,950 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Cox results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,520 hits . Analysis detected 11,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,332 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,851 of 6,258 authors). This Joseph Cox is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Joseph Cox
Author details
Total words: 10,332
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst