Topic summary
66%38 analyzed articles/videos28,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 13,311 hits. Analysis detected 113,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 139,681 analyzed words across 38 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,398 of 15,763 topics). This Food is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751008.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score38 analyzed articles139.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate