Topic summary
66% 38 analyzed articles/videos 28,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 13,311 hits . Analysis detected 113,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 139,681 analyzed words across 38 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,398 of 15,763 topics). This Food is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Food
Topic details
Total words: 139,681
Article count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score38 analyzed articles139.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst