Author summary
24% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Momo Chang results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 317 hits . Analysis detected 2,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,272 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,242 of 6,319 authors). This Momo Chang is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Momo Chang
Author details
Total words: 4,272
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst