Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olga Mecking results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 555 hits . Analysis detected 4,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (2,911 of 6,162 authors). This Olga Mecking is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Olga Mecking
Author details
Total words: 5,248
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst