Author summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos10,080 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ava Berger results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 2,762 hits. Analysis detected 31,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,088 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,200 of 6,135 authors). This Ava Berger is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Ava Berger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
16%Ava Berger (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 39,088
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510015.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles39.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.0%7.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate